This is a can of worms topic in the world of photography. Generally speaking photographers fall in one of two categories:
- Category 1: "I HATE HDR, it is overdone, overused, it is a gimmicky post processing trick that attempts to turn a bad photo into a good one, and I can't stand it".
- Category 2: "I LOVE HDR, it is a great tool because it lets us see a dynamic range closer to what the eye sees."
Here is something to consider: People that buy and/or enjoy photography but are not photographers seem to all love HDR (generally speaking). These folks don't know it is HDR or even what HDR means. They just know whether or not they like the photo. What an interesting concept. The end product is all they care about. They might want to know what the photographer was thinking when they composed the image or they might like to hear the story of it's creation. But dollars to donuts they could care less if it's HDR.
I want to charge each of you with this... FORGET the method used for a given photograph and evaluate wether or not you "like" the image. In the end, that is all that really matters.
Check out these other posts regarding this same topic:
Mike Pedde http://www.wolfnowl.com/2011/01/why-use-hdr/